Relationship in Sets using Venn Diagram (advance math)

Created with Sketch.

Relationship in Sets using Venn Diagram

 

The relationship in sets using Venn diagram are discussed below:

The union of two sets can be represented by Venn diagrams by the shaded region, representing A ∪ B.

 A ∪ B when A ⊂ B

A ∪ B when A ⊂ B

A ∪ B when neither A ⊂ B nor B ⊂ A

 

A ∪ B when neither A ⊂ B nor B ⊂ A

 

A ∪ B when A and B are Disjoint Sets

A ∪ B when A and B are disjoint sets

 The intersection of two sets can be represented by Venn diagram, with the shaded region representing A ∩ B.

A ∩ B when A ⊂ B, i.e., A ∩ B = A

A ∩ B when A ⊂ B, i.e., A ∩ B = A

 

A ∩ B when neither A ⊂ B nor B ⊂ A

A ∩ B when neither A ⊂ B nor B ⊂ A

 

A ∩ B = ϕ No shaded Part

A ∩ B = ϕ No shaded part

The difference of two sets can be represented by Venn diagrams, with the shaded region representing A – B.

A – B when B ⊂ A

A – B when B ⊂ A

 

A – B when neither A ⊂ B nor B ⊂ A

A – B when neither A ⊂ B nor B ⊂ A

 

A – B when A and B are Disjoint Sets

 

A – B when A and B are disjoint sets.

Here A – B = A

 

A – B when A ⊂ B

A – B when A ⊂ B

Here A – B = ϕ

Relationship between the three Sets using Venn Diagram

 If ξ represents the universal set and A, B, C are the three subsets of the universal sets. Here, all the three sets are overlapping sets.

Let us learn to represent various operations on these sets.

A ∪ B ∪ C

 

A ∪ B ∪ C

 

A ∩ B ∩ C

 

A ∩ B ∩ C

 

A ∪ (B ∩ C)

A ∪ (B ∩ C)

 

A ∩ (B ∪ C)

A ∩ (B ∪ C)

 

Some important results on number of elements in sets and their use in practical problems.

Now, we shall learn the utility of set theory in practical problems.

If A is a finite set, then the number of elements in A is denoted by n(A).

Relationship in Sets using Venn Diagram
Let A and B be two finite sets, then two cases arise:

A and B be Two Finite Sets

Case 1:

A and B are disjoint.

Here, we observe that there is no common element in A and B.

Therefore, n(A ∪ B) = n(A) + n(B)

 

A and B are not Disjoint Sets

Case 2:

When A and B are not disjoint, we have from the figure

(i) n(A ∪ B) = n(A) + n(B) – n(A ∩ B)

(ii) n(A ∪ B) = n(A – B) + n(B – A) + n(A ∩ B)

(iii) n(A) = n(A – B) + n(A ∩ B)

(iv) n(B) = n(B – A) + n(A ∩ B)

 

Sets A – B

 

 

A – B

 

Sets B – A

 

 

B – A

 

A ∩ B Sets

 

 

A ∩ B

 

Let A, B, C be any three finite sets, then

n(A ∪ B ∪ C) = n[(A ∪ B) ∪ C]

= n(A ∪ B) + n(C) – n[(A ∪ B) ∩ C]

= [n(A) + n(B) – n(A ∩ B)] + n(C) – n [(A ∩ C) ∪ (B ∩ C)]

= n(A) + n(B) + n(C) – n(A ∩ B) – n(A ∩ C) – n(B ∩ C) + n(A ∩ B ∩ C)

[Since, (A ∩ C) ∩ (B ∩ C) = A ∩ B ∩ C]

Therefore, n(A ∪B ∪ C) = n(A) + n(B) + n(C) – n(A ∩ B) – n(B ∩ C) – n(C ∩ A) + n(A ∩ B ∩ C)

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This is a free online math calculator together with a variety of other free math calculatorsMaths calculators
+